Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP’s Auto Fraud Legal Center has filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of Aurelio Deniz and two classes of auto purchasers against Maurice J. Sopp & Son and Chase Auto Finance.  The first class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit is consumers who purchased vehicles from Maurice J. Sopp & Son and whose contracts do not separately itemize fees due to the DMV for license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees. The second class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit is all car buyers in California whose purchase contracts do not separately itemize fees due to the DMV for license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees, and whose contracts are held by Chase Auto Finance.  Mr. Deniz purchased a used
Nissan Sentra from Maurice J. Sopp & Son in January 2010, and his contract falsely stated registration, transfer, and titling fees were not applicable to her transaction.  Mr. Deniz’s contract was assigned by Maurice J. Sopp & Son to Chase Auto Finance.  The contract, the standard form vehicle purchase contract used in California, included a clause whereby the holder of the contract, in this
case Chase Auto Finance, agreed to be responsible for any claims that could be brought against the seller, Maurice J. Sopp & Son.

If any of these practices happened to you at Maurice J. Sopp & Son, or any other dealership in California, or your contract was assigned to Chase Auto Finance, and you would like more information about this class action case or how the Auto Fraud Legal Center can help you, please feel free to contact Hawk Barry, either by phone at 800-466-5366, or via electronic mail at

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP’s Auto Fraud Legal Center
has filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf
of Aurelio Deniz and two classes of auto
purchasers against Maurice J. Sopp & Son
and Chase Auto Finance.  The first class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit
is consumers who purchased vehicles from Maurice J.
Sopp & Son and whose contracts do not separately itemize fees due to
the DMV for license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees.
The second class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit is all car buyers in California
whose purchase contracts do not separately itemize fees due to the DMV for
license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees, and whose contracts
are held by Chase Auto Finance.  Mr. Deniz purchased a used
Nissan Sentra from Maurice J. Sopp & Son
in January
2010, and his
contract falsely stated registration, transfer, and titling fees were not
applicable to her transaction.  Mr. Deniz’s contract was assigned by Maurice J. Sopp & Son to Chase Auto
Finance.  The contract, the standard form vehicle purchase contract used
in California, included a clause whereby the holder of the contract, in this
case Chase Auto Finance, agreed to be responsible for any claims that could be
brought against the seller, Maurice J. Sopp &
Son.

If any of these practices happened to you at Maurice J. Sopp & Son, or any other dealership
in California, or your contract was assigned to Chase Auto Finance, and you
would like more information about this class action case or how the Auto Fraud
Legal Center can help you, please feel free to contact Hawk Barry, either by
phone at 800-466-5366, or via electronic mail at hawk@rbblawgroup.com.

.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP’s Auto Fraud Legal Center has filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on behalf of Aurelio Deniz and two classes of auto purchasers against Maurice J. Sopp & Son and Chase Auto Finance.  The first class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit is consumers who purchased vehicles from Maurice J. Sopp & Son and whose contracts do not separately itemize fees due to the DMV for license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees.  The second class identified in Mr. Deniz’s lawsuit is all car buyers in California whose purchase contracts do not separately itemize fees due to the DMV for license fees and registration, transfer, and titling fees, and whose contracts are held by Chase Auto Finance.  Mr. Deniz purchased a used Nissan Sentra from Maurice J. Sopp & Son in January 2010, and his contract falsely stated registration, transfer, and titling fees were not applicable to her transaction.  Mr. Deniz’s contract was assigned by Maurice J. Sopp & Son to Chase Auto Finance.  The contract, the standard form vehicle purchase contract used in California, included a clause whereby the holder of the contract, in this case Chase Auto Finance, agreed to be responsible for any claims that could be brought against the seller, Maurice J. Sopp & Son.

If any of these practices happened to you at Maurice J. Sopp & Son, or any other dealership in California, or your contract was assigned to Chase Auto Finance, and you would like more information about this class action case or how the Auto Fraud Legal Center can help you, please feel free to contact Hawk Barry, either by phone at 800-466-5366, or via electronic mail at hawk@rbblawgroup.com.