Skip navigation.
Hablamos Espanol
(800) 4NO-LEMON
(800) 466-5366
Call (800) 4-NO LEMON for a Free Case Review
10085 Carroll Canyon Rd, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92131

Archive for the ‘Lemon Law’ Category

What to Do When Dealerships Cancel Car Contracts

Thursday, October 20th, 2011

Yesterday, we discussed how dealerships are allowed to cancel your car contract, but only if they do so within 10 days of the date on the purchase contract. If the dealership cancels within 10 days, you get your down payment or trade-in back. The purchase contract requires the car dealer to return everything that was given for the purchase. This includes your trade-in vehicle. If you gave a $2,000 down payment and a car as a trade-in, the car dealer must give you back both the $2,000 and the trade-in when you return the car you purchased.

Sometimes a car dealer may tell you that it already sold your trade-in, and will offer you the value of the trade-in as listed on the purchase contract. The language of the purchase contract does not appear to give the car dealer this option. It requires the return of the trade-in. However, if the car dealer does sell your trade-in, at the very least, you should tell the car dealer that it has to give you whatever is the highest value for your trade-in out of either:

  • The value of the trade-in as listed on the purchase contract
  • The fair market value
  • What the car dealer received when it sold your trade-in

Tomorrow we will discuss what car dealers CANNOT do with your car contract. If you believe that a dealership violated California lemon law in your last car purchase, contact our office today for a free evaluation. Our California lemon law lawyers have successfully litigated cases of auto dealership fraud cases for more than two decades.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

When Dealerships Are Allowed To Cancel Car Contracts

Wednesday, October 19th, 2011

Our law firm helps many consumers looking to get out of bad car contracts, but it is important for everybody to know that car dealers can also cancel a car contract. If you buy a car that is financed through the dealership, the dealer is allowed to cancel the contract. However, it can only cancel the contract if it notifies you within 10 days of the date on the purchase contract. If you look at the back of your purchase contract, you will find the box that says “Seller’s Right to Cancel” at the bottom of the second column.

The “Seller’s Right to Cancel” box advises you that after you sign the purchase contract and leave with the car, the dealership is going to find a finance company or bank to buy your contract. This language gives a car dealer the opportunity to find someone to buy your purchase contract. While most of the time this is not a problem, the car dealer can cancel the purchase contract if it cannot find someone to buy your purchase contract. However, the car dealer must notify you within 10 days of the date on the purchase contract. If it does not, then the purchase is final and cannot be cancelled. The dealership is then the finance company for the contract and you can make your payments to it.  Every purchase contract relating to a car purchase in California that we have reviewed has included this provision in it, and our firm has seen thousands of purchase contracts.

Tomorrow we will discuss what to do if the dealer does cancel within the 10 days. If you believe that a dealership violated California lemon law in your last car purchase, contact our office today for a free evaluation. Our California lemon law lawyers have successfully litigated cases of auto dealership fraud cases for more than two decades.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

New Law Puts Warning Stickers on Lemons, But Leaves Some Seeing Red

Tuesday, October 18th, 2011

A bill signed by Gov. Jerry Brown will go into effect on July 1, 2012 and require new and used car dealers to mark lemon law vehicles with a red warning sticker. The bill had the support of consumer advocates, law enforcement officials and both the California New Car Dealers Association and the National Independent Automobile Dealers Association (NIADA), which represents used car dealers.

While there is large support for full disclosure of a vehicle’s history, the legislation is not without its critics. Dealers supported the bill largely because it will allow them to charge more for documentation fees, raising the caps from $55 for purchases and $45 for leases to $80 for either.

But another requirement of the law is for dealers to run a vehicle’s identification number through the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System, established by Congress and operated by the Justice Department. Commercial systems like Carfax, AutoCheck and Experian claim that was wrong for the state to mandate one information supplier. An official from Carfax also testified during a hearing in July that the federal check system was far from perfect, but Carfax itself has faced class action lawsuits about the company concealing the limits on the information it collects.

Consumer advocates are hoping the California law will lead to a federal program of the same type. On that level, however, MSN reported on October 3, 2011 that NIADA opposes the idea primarily because of the red warning sticker. “Title brands should be more uniform, branding systems should be accurate and databases should be complete,” said Brad Miller, NIADA’s associate director of legal and regulatory affairs. “Pursuing these goals via a window sticker is an outmoded concept that makes little sense. Instead this type of information should be gathered, maintained and made available to consumers in a uniform electronic format.”

Do you think the red sticker will reduce auto dealership fraud in California? Would you support the state law becoming a federal program? Our California lemon law lawyers want to hear from you. Share your comments with us below, and if you believe that a dealership violated California lemon law in your last car purchase, contact our office today for a free evaluation.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

Jury Finds Mercedes Argument All Wet

Monday, October 17th, 2011

A Los Angeles Superior Court jury issued a $128,000 verdict against Mercedes-Benz on September 26, 2011, for violating California lemon law when it refused to repurchase a Mercedes SL 550R with a trunk leak defect. According to a press release, Albert Ataian brought the car into Mercedes dealerships on four occasions and scheduled a direct meeting with Mercedes’ factory representatives to discuss the problem, even providing Mercedes and its dealerships with photographs and videos of the trunk leak in an effort to help them diagnose the problem. However, Mercedes repeatedly failed to fix the problem, with the leak becoming so bad that water damaged electrical components in the trunk to the point that they were inoperable.

The jury’s verdict included a $10,000 civil penalty against Mercedes for willfully violating the California lemon law, and the release noted that the court will later determine Ataian’s attorney’s fees and costs before being added to the judgment.

Ataian had given Mercedes a reasonable chance to fix the defect, but the violation of California lemon law was when the dealership failed to fix the vehicle and refused to repurchase it. Have you had a similar experience with your last car purchase? If you believe you have been a victim of auto dealership fraud, contact our California lemon law lawyers today to get a free evaluation of your case.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys