Skip navigation.
Hablamos Espanol
(800) 4NO-LEMON
(800) 466-5366
Call (800) 4-NO LEMON for a Free Case Review
10085 Carroll Canyon Rd, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92131

Archive for the ‘San Diego Lemon Law’ Category

Huge Lemon Law Victory for California Truck Owners

Friday, September 9th, 2011

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt’s Auto Fraud Legal Center is please to announce that on September 6, 2011, three justices on the Third District of the California Court of Appeal issued a published opinion confirming that trucks weighing 10,000 pounds are covered by the California lemon law, even if they are used by a business with less than five vehicles registered in its name. The case is Joyce v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. C064453.

Unlike most other states, California’s lemon law covers vehicles that are used for business purposes, so long as the vehicle has a “gross vehicle weight” of less than 10,000 pounds, and that business has less than five vehicles registered in its name.  The law specifically includes the phrase “gross vehicle weight.” For a number years, Ford Motor Company has taken the seemingly ridiculous position that “gross vehicle weight” as used in Californai Lemon Law means the same thing as ”gross vehicle weight rating.” ”Gross vehicle weight” is the weight of the vehicle as actually used while “gross vehicle weight rating” is the maximum weight that could be put on the vehicle.  Ford Motor Company uses “gross vehicle weight rating,” because the weight rating for a number of its ”F-series” trucks is over 10,000 pounds.  It has denied lemon law requests and claims by vehicle owners based on this position.  However, Ford Motor Company cannot do this anymore.  The Court of Appeal made clear that “gross vehicle weight” means the curb weight of the vehicle plus the expected weight of passengers and gas in the vehicle.

The reason for Ford Motor Company taking this position with its “F-series” trucks may have to do with the fact that the diesel engines in these trucks suffer from a serious problems.  These problems have caused Ford Motor Company to buyback a number of these trucks as lemons, so many in fact, that Ford Motor Company has filed a lawsuit against the company that manufacturers these engines for it.  If you have a Ford truck with engine issues, you should contact a lemon law attorney.

As part of the Court of Appeal’s ruling, it ordered that verdict be entered in Mr. Joyce’s favor, and that a further trial be held on whether Mr. Joyce is entitled to a civil penalty for Ford Motor Company’s failure to buyback his truck at his request.

The appeal was handled by Hallen Rosner at Rosner, Barry & Babbitt’s Auto Fraud Legal Center, who can be reached at 858-348-1005 or hal@rbblawgroup.com.

The Court’s Opinion can be found at:

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/C064453.PDF

 

 

Beware Online Car Fraud, FBI Warns

Thursday, September 8th, 2011

San Diego residents need to take extra caution when buying cars online, the Federal Bureau of Investigation said in a recent statement after about 75 people were victimized by online car scams between 2008 and 2010, NBC San Diego reported on August 25, 2011. The FBI said there has been an increase in complaints of fraudulent auto sales, with most of the complaints filed to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) coming from buyers who were “misled by seemingly sound protection claims.”

NBC reported that the criminals often use the names of reputable protection programs such as eBay Motors Vehicle Protection Plan, usually saying that “they will be moving, or are about to be deployed, and cannot meet in person to check out the car” before requesting that buyers wire money and send a receipt. “Criminals create an attractive deal by advertising vehicles for sale at prices below book value,” the warning stated, according to NBC.

The IC3 said on average, San Diego victims of online car fraud lost $4,800, with 48 of the 75 complaints resulting in actual loss. Furthermore, NBC added that 14,000 people in the United States have been victims of fraudulent car sales online.

Remember that if a deal sounds too good to be true, it probably is. If you think you’ve received a sour deal that violates California lemon law, contact one of our California lemon lawyers.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

Advertised as Certified, Sold As-Is: CA Lemon Law Says No

Friday, September 2nd, 2011

While multiple manufacturers and some dealerships offer “certified” used vehicle programs, too many vehicles that do not actually qualify as “certified” under the standards advertised are still being labeled as such. Occasionally, auto dealership fraud involves consumers who instead end up with vehicles that have frame damage from prior accidents.

Typically, a used vehicle that passes certain standards would be labeled “certified used” with amenities such as an extended warranty, an assurance that the automobile has passed a detailed inspection, a guarantee to the buyer that the vehicle is free from major structural damage (such as prior accidents), and is thus in good working order.

However, there have been a number of cases where customers have purchased supposedly “certified” vehicles that turned out to actually be rebuilt wrecks. Deeming a car “certified” allows dealers to mark up the asking price of a used car substantially. Consumers are encouraged to ask to see the inspection list and thoroughly investigate the vehicle’s history. Additionally, California lemon law prohibits dealers from advertising a used car as “certified” and then selling the vehicle “AS IS.”

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

CA Lemon Law Says So: What’s Used Cannot Be New Again

Thursday, September 1st, 2011

California lemon law requires that a dealership describe the vehicle being purchased as either “new” or “used.” A used vehicle also includes a vehicle used by manufacturer or dealership representatives (also known as an executive car, a “demo” or demonstrator vehicle). In addition, some vehicles that were previously sold but for some reason returned (usually because the failure to obtain financing) are also used.  In these situations, the contract cannot sell the vehicle is “new.” It must say “used.”

If a seller sells a “demo” as “new” on the contract, that would constitute auto dealership fraud. If a new vehicle has been operated by either a factory or dealership representative, it should be considered used.  Similarly, if it was sold by the dealership and then returned because the dealer could not find financing, it would constitute fraud to sell the car as “new.”

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law lawyers