Skip navigation.
Hablamos Espanol
(800) 4NO-LEMON
(800) 466-5366
Call (800) 4-NO LEMON for a Free Case Review
10085 Carroll Canyon Rd, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92131

Archive for the ‘Wrecked Vehicles’ Category

10 Important Questions to Ask When Buying a Used Car

Friday, October 28th, 2011

The Gawker Media-owned car weblog Jalopnik asked readers to contribute the 10 most important questions to ask when buying a used car as part of their daily “Answers of the Day” segment. The 10 best questions published on October 19, 2011 were:

10. Is this the original paint? — New paint could indicate car was rusting or involved in a previous accident.

9. Can I check the oil? — An “earmark for trouble with a used car,” Jalopnik says, look for water, fuel, or foam in the oil.

8. Can you put this on the lift? — This will allow you to check for leaks or rust, but furthermore, you know there is something amiss if the dealer will not let you do this.

7. Why are you selling it? — It is “a question that openly invites the seller to lie to you,” Jalopnik says, but it will still put the seller on the spot.

6. Who was the previous owner? — The more you know about the history of the vehicle, the more comfortable you will be. You can also learn a lot from how a dealer reacts if you ask for a phone number of the previous owner.

5. Do you have the title in hand? — An important issue that can cause larger problems later if overlooked.

4. Can I take it for a test drive? — One of the most telling parts of the process, you should most certainly walk away if the seller refuses.

3. Can I see the Carfax? — Or at least see some similar type of vehicle history report, and be sure you have obtained the right VIN number to avoid a mix-and-match.

2. Can I see the maintenance history? — While you should not expect to see an complete service record history, insufficient information from the seller here will probably affect your decision on whether or not to purchase the vehicle.

1. Can I take this to my mechanic? — This is essentially a must. A refusal from the seller should equate to a refusal to give any further thought toward purchasing the vehicle.

Many instances of auto dealership fraud involve sellers taking advantage of consumers who do not perform due diligence beforehand. If you believe that a car dealer violated California lemon law in your last purchase or you need help getting out of a car contract, contact our office today to set up a free consultation with one of our California lemon law lawyers.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt’s Auto Fraud Legal Center sues North County Buick Cadillac GMC

Wednesday, October 26th, 2011

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt’s Auto Fraud Legal Center has filed a lawsuit against North County Buick Cadillac GMC, which is located in Escondido, California.  The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Jose Delgado in San Diego County Superior Court.  Mr. Delgado purchased a 2007 Cadillac Escalade from North County Buick Cadillac GMC on July 8, 2011.  The Cadillac was sold to Mr. Delgado with a 3 month/3,000 mile express warranty.  The sale of the Cadillac with an express warranty creates an implied warranty that the Cadillac is merchantability.

The lawsuit alleges that shortly after the purchase, Mr. Delgado discovered that the Cadillac had been involved in an accident prior to being sold to him.  Mr. Delgado asked if the Cadillac had been involved in any accidents before.  He was told “no.” The sale of the Cadillac with accident damage breached the implied warranty of merchantability, thus violating the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, sometimes referred to as the “Lemon Law.” Further, the failure to disclose the prior accident when asked violated the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Vehicle Code, and Unfair Competition Law.

Mr. Delgado is seeking to get his money back and return the Cadillac as well as an injunction preventing North County Buick Cadillac GMC from engaging in similar practices in the future.  If you have any questions about this matter, please contact Hal Rosner at 800-466-5366 or hal@rbblawgroup.com.

New Law Puts Warning Stickers on Lemons, But Leaves Some Seeing Red

Tuesday, October 18th, 2011

A bill signed by Gov. Jerry Brown will go into effect on July 1, 2012 and require new and used car dealers to mark lemon law vehicles with a red warning sticker. The bill had the support of consumer advocates, law enforcement officials and both the California New Car Dealers Association and the National Independent Automobile Dealers Association (NIADA), which represents used car dealers.

While there is large support for full disclosure of a vehicle’s history, the legislation is not without its critics. Dealers supported the bill largely because it will allow them to charge more for documentation fees, raising the caps from $55 for purchases and $45 for leases to $80 for either.

But another requirement of the law is for dealers to run a vehicle’s identification number through the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System, established by Congress and operated by the Justice Department. Commercial systems like Carfax, AutoCheck and Experian claim that was wrong for the state to mandate one information supplier. An official from Carfax also testified during a hearing in July that the federal check system was far from perfect, but Carfax itself has faced class action lawsuits about the company concealing the limits on the information it collects.

Consumer advocates are hoping the California law will lead to a federal program of the same type. On that level, however, MSN reported on October 3, 2011 that NIADA opposes the idea primarily because of the red warning sticker. “Title brands should be more uniform, branding systems should be accurate and databases should be complete,” said Brad Miller, NIADA’s associate director of legal and regulatory affairs. “Pursuing these goals via a window sticker is an outmoded concept that makes little sense. Instead this type of information should be gathered, maintained and made available to consumers in a uniform electronic format.”

Do you think the red sticker will reduce auto dealership fraud in California? Would you support the state law becoming a federal program? Our California lemon law lawyers want to hear from you. Share your comments with us below, and if you believe that a dealership violated California lemon law in your last car purchase, contact our office today for a free evaluation.

Rosner, Barry & Babbitt, LLP — California lemon law attorneys

Land Rover Upgrades Certified Vehicle Program

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

Land Rover announced it would be launching an all-new “Select Certified Pre-Owned” program on October 1, 2011. According to AutoWeek, Land Rover Select CPO buyers will get a six-year or 100,000-mile comprehensive limited warranty, 24-hour roadside assistance, a 150-point inspection and no deductible on their vehicles.

MotorAuthority reported that the new program will also feature a transferrable warranty that would stay with the vehicle upon resale if certain criteria are met, and the program if offered on the entire Land Rover lineup. Most used vehicles in the program were manufactured in the last five years and have less than 60,000 miles on their odometers.

Again, consumers need to keep in mind that just because a vehicle has the “certified” used label does not necessarily make it so. Supposedly “certified” vehicles are another type of auto dealership fraud our California lemon law lawyers handle. While some unscrupulous dealers deem a vehicle “certified” just to inflate the asking price, California lemon law prohibits dealers from advertising a used car as “certified” and then selling the vehicle “AS IS.” Were you misled about a supposedly certified used vehicle? Our California lemon law attorneys want to hear from you. Share your thoughts with us in the comments below.